Priority 8 from the Foot Health PSP
|UNCERTAINTY: What evidence is there that foot health research is used in clinical practice and the impact that it has on clinical outcomes? (JLA PSP Priority 8)|
|JLA question ID||0092/8|
|Explanatory note||Despite a growing body of evidence (although currently limited in scope and quality overall), there is a need to demonstrate the usability and impact that foot health research has on clinical outcomes for patients, practitioners and health service commissioners|
J Foot Ankle Res. 2017 Nov 22;10:51. doi: 10.1186/s13047-017-0232-3. eCollection 2017. Evidence for current recommendations concerning the management of foot health for people with chronic long-term conditions: a systematic review. Edwards K(1), Borthwick A(2), McCulloch L(2), Redmond A(3), Pinedo-Villanueva R(1), Prieto-Alhambra D(1), Judge A(1), Arden N(1), Bowen C(1)(2).
|Health Research Classification System category||Generic health relevance|
|Extra information provided by this PSP|
|Original uncertainty examples||
How do the results of research into treatments get adopted into clinical practice? ~ what is the impact over time (of research) on individual patients and groups of patients?
|Submitted by||Healthcare professional x 4, Other x 2|
|PSP unique ID||0092|
|PSP name||Foot Health|
|Total number of uncertainties identified by this PSP.||30 (To see a full list of all uncertainties identified, please see the detailed spreadsheet held on the JLA website)|
|Date of priority setting workshop||26 September 2019|