Priority 2 from the Hyperemesis Gravidarum PSP
|UNCERTAINTY: How can we most effectively manage hyperemesis gravidarum? What clinical support measure is most important to women who have had hyperemesis and what did they find most beneficial? eg medical management, pharmaceutical review, nutrition support, rehydration, psychological support (JLA PSP Priority 2)
|JLA question ID
|Not available for this PSP
Some trials, case-control and case studies for various support measures. No SR, no large well conducted trials.
|Health Research Classification System category
|Reproductive health and childbirth
|Extra information provided by this PSP
|Original uncertainty examples
|What’s the best way to manage HG? ~ What clinical support measure is most important to women who have had hyperemesis and what did they find most beneficial? eg medical management, pharmaceutical review, nutrition support, rehydration, psychological support. ~ What are the best treatment methods for Hyperemisis Gravidarum? ~ What is the treatment recommendations? (Including medicines, food intake, intravenous therapy, psychological help...) ~ How can we use the medical intervention available to us to make this disease more bearable for mothers who suffer?
|Patients x 27 ~ Healthcare professionals x 6 ~ Carers x 3 ~ Offspring x 5 ~ Unknown x 7
|PSP unique ID
|Total number of uncertainties identified by this PSP.
|65 (To see a full list of all uncertainties identified, please see the detailed spreadsheet held on the JLA website)
|Date of priority setting workshop
|9 October 2019