Blood Pressure in Pregnancy PSP Engagement Summary

Gathering uncertainties

Methods used (eg, survey, focus groups, interviews)

• Online survey answered by those with lived experience of pregnancy hypertension and healthcare professionals using http://www.onlinesurveys.ac.uk platform
• Steering group identified uncertainties that had been previously reported by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, International Society for the study of Hypertension in Pregnancy and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

	Number	%
Total respondents (across all methods)	278	100
Total women and their families	189	68
Total healthcare professionals	71	26
Total number of original uncertainties submitted	764	100
Original uncertainties in scope	746	98
Original uncertainties out of scope	18	2

 

Interim prioritisation

Methods used (eg, survey, focus groups, interviews):

• Online survey answered by those with lived experience of pregnancy hypertension and healthcare professionals using https://www.optimalworkshop.com/. platform

	Number	%
Total number of indicative questions (answered & unanswered)	50	100
Number of verified answered questions	0	0
Number of verified unanswered questions	50	100
Number of verified unanswered questions included in the interim prioritisation	50
Total respondents (across all methods)	155	100
Total women and their families	91	59
Total healthcare professionals	49	32
Number of questions taken to final workshop	25

 

Final priority setting workshop

	Number	%
Total participants	29	100
Total women and their families	16	55
Total healthcare professionals	11	38

Notes

eg please explain if totals do not add up to 100%

• Pregnancy hypertension researchers answered the initial online survey and the interim prioritisation survey, therefore the totals do not add up to 100%
• At the final workshop we had a representative from the Stillbirth and Neonatal Death Charity (SANDs) and a representative from the Best Beginnings charity.